On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:41 AM, M-D November <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe they figured the old logo with the double-crescents was too > reminiscent of Comcast's own logo? I would have figured that would be a point in favor for the old logo. Companies love to put its brand on acquisitions. Look at CNBC whose initials coincidently contained NBC. Frankly, I don't think it really matters all that much what the NBCU group > logo is changed to, as long as the individual units (NBC, Universal Studios, > et al) retain their identities. > This to me is a bad sign. NBC Universal I'm sure employs a great many designers. You can't really run TV networks or a movie studio without them. Yet I suspect this was done with little input from those people. (Come to think of it, I'm sure the folks working in the graphics and promo departments at the Comcast networks could have done better.) -- Wesley McGee http://www.ambivi.com http://drawing-a-blank.tumblr.com -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
