It's more than that. Unlike her previous projects, this one's made her a star.
She'll have more options in the future -- as well as those bigger paychecks. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jon Delfin Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] And this year's Emmy's host will be... Let's stay on point. Kevin isn't accusing Lynch of being untalented, but of being a sellout. Anybody who's never done anything strictly for the paycheck, raise your hand. Yeah, that's what I thought. On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ... the formerly talented Jane Lynch, who sold her soul when she took >>> the "Glee" gig. >>> >>> http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/jane-lynch-or-sue-sylvester-to- host-emmys/?partner=rss&emc=rss >> >> So only actors who can't find work are talented? >> >> Jane Lynch put the time and effort in over the years and I'm glad to >> see her finally get the recognition and rewards. > > No, only actors who have to settle for a series that shamelessly > panders to its audience are untalented. > > I have a feeling "Glee" is the next incarnation of "30 Rock," inasmuch > as I know many people who adore the series -- people whose opinion I > respect adore the series -- and I just can't figure it out. Still > living here at the homestead, I've had to endure a few episodes of > this series (my sister is a fan). The songs are generally painful, to > the point where I'd have rather heard Rebecca Black sing "Friday" as > opposed to the "Glee" version. The storyline makes the old "ABC > AfterSchool Special" scripts seem deep and substantive. The show's > fans talk about how awesome it is because they are able to so quickly > choreograph and produce musical shows in such a condensed period of > time, but it looks rushed and half assed. The only thing I can assume > is that it has been so long since Hollywood has produced a quality > musical for the big or the small screen that people who don't watch > the classics on TCM genuinely don't know how much better they can be. > > > > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
