Well, since there are only three episodes, I wouldn't go about skipping one. But, yes, it's much more consistent.
The middle episode is a clever reworking of The Hound of the Baskervilles, and still plays out as a horror piece. Adam On 20 Jan 2012 05:38, "televisiongirl" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Joe Coughlin <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The second series of Sherlock was so much better than the already good >> first series. And yes, it does stink that most of America has to wait >> until May for some reason. > > > > Is it more consistent? The first series had one really good episode, one > really dull episode and one really racist episode. A little all over the > board. > > TVG > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
