On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Diner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Gawker noted it too, in an article entitled "America's Wrongest Television > Critic Strikes Again." Bottom line: It's true that there was no highlight > reel on the show. How then, could Alessandra Stanley have stated that there > was? "Probably because if you watch the relevant *Today* show > segment<http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/28/tearful-ann-curry-tells-audience-she-is-leaving-as-today-co-host/>online, > as opposed to, I don't know, > *on television*, it autoplays the highlight reel from Curry's first day > after the segment ends. This should be obvious to anyone watching > carefully, though, since everyone is wearing different clothes and it's > obviously an introductory, rather than a valedictory, segment." > > > http://gawker.com/5922385/americas-wrongest-television-critic-strikes-again?tag=alessandra-stanley >
Thanks - that explains it. Not quite as bad I guess as totally dry labbing a review, but youtubing it still seems a little bit like cheating - especially of the criticism is going to include a focus on what the program chose to cover and not cover. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
