Translation - networks only get the best value for money in prime time. Can't be that surprising.
Would this shake out differently if you factored in the full cost of the shows? Would Burrell or Snooki get the same dollar/viewer rate if they weren't part of ensembles? David ________________________________ From: Brad Beam <[email protected]> Subject: [TV orNotTV] Are they worth it? The "LA Times" did a sampled survey of 24 celebrities to determine their per-customer efficiency. The top 3 in per-viewer spending: 1 Chelsea Handler: $16.70 2 Anderson Cooper: $13.54 3 David Letterman: $9.69 The bottom 3: 22 Christina Aguilera: $0.17 23 Snooki: $0.16 24 Ty Burrell: $0.08 K.O. was listed, but not included, in the article for his time at Current -- his $10+ million salary worked out to $56/viewer. http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-star-pay-20120715,0,3421786.story (summary chart linked within the story) _ _ |_>|_> Brad Beam- Belle WV |_>|_> http://www.facebook.com/74bmw -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
