This wasn't about the money or publicity. I just think it was about the
lack of credit given for the arrangement.


On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Melissa P <[email protected]>wrote:

> Well, that’s what should have happened.  He’ll make some money (for two
> charities) that he otherwise wouldn’t have made thanks to Glee stealing his
> arrangement.****
>
> ** **
>
> BTW I disagree with Lynch’s math.  It was only one song on a series that
> has lots of songs, and Coulton was only the arranger, not the writer.  I
> doubt that many pennies changed hands.****
>
> ** **
>
> Melissa****
>
> Curious about the  email address?  Listen to the most beautiful song ever
> sung. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtB4UDMEkpU&feature=related>****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *David Bruggeman
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:45 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Glee vs. Jonathan Coulton****
>
> ** **
>
> JoCo has (re)released it on iTunes in an attempt to stick it to FOX (it
> was/still is available as a track from his 2005 album Thing A Week One).
>  Proceeds for the next month to charity.****
>
> ** **
>
> http://www.jonathancoulton.com/2013/01/26/baby-got-back-glee-style/****
>
> ** **
>
> David****
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* David Lynch <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 26, 2013 2:03 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Glee vs. Jonathan Coulton****
>
> ** **
>
> On 26 January 2013 11:02, Melissa P <[email protected]> wrote:***
> *
>
> My points:  Coulton is getting publicity for his work that he otherwise
> wouldn’t have gotten.  ****
>
>  ****
>
> So free publicity is supposed to make up for the fact that, by the time
> you add up advertising during the episode, iTunes downloads, physical CDs,
> DVDs, and cast tours, Fox is probably going to gross more off of ripping
> him off than he ever did for the original?****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> David J. Lynch
> [email protected] -- ****
>
> --
> --
> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
>
>  ****
>
> --
> --
> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
>
>
>



-- 
Jason Carpio
[email protected]
Twitter: wolvie75
G+: https://profiles.google.com/u/1/115807424212473677796

Not sent from an iPhone

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en


Reply via email to