If I'm understanding this correctly -- and I have no intentions of 
listening to the actual podcast, since either Maron or Griffin alone is 
enough to make my ears bleed, but the prospect of the two of them would be 
seizure-inducing -- Griffin is upset because, following a supporting role 
on a mediocre sitcom, she wasn't immediately offered leads, movies, and 
garbage trucks full of hundred dollar bills. While I suppose she's to be 
congratulated for building the career she has, you could fill the Rose Bowl 
with actors who were in similar positions and had zero offers.

--Dave Sikula

On Friday, September 19, 2014 6:11:04 PM UTC-7, PGage wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Per the interview, once Suddenly Susan wrapped Griffin and her people 
>> assumed she'd land a starring vehicle for herself. It never materialized. 
>> What she said in the interview was she ultimately found herself doing the 
>> reality series and related banality because no other offers occurred. And 
>> once you find yourself working crappy shows (as I experienced working 
>> behind the scenes in dick clark productions hell), it is tough to catch a 
>> break and advance to something more substantive/rewarding. 
>>
>> Like I said, not a fan of hers, but people wanting to hear a realistic 
>> side of the pandering nature of Hollywood should listen to her. It is rare 
>> to find anyone in the business who openly admits, hey, I'd rather be doing 
>> something better than this. The only other one who comes to mind is 
>> Harrison Ford who has freely admitted to both Conan O'Brien and Jon Stewart 
>> that the movies he's there to promote aren't worth watching.
>>
>
> Again, while I am not a huge fan of hers, and of much of her genre, I 
> think it is important to distinguish between her understanding of what she 
> is doing and how others might interpret it. I don't think she sees "D List" 
> as crappy banality, I think she sees that as her taking her lack of 
> opportunity into something she made for herself and that she is quite proud 
> of.
>
> I think in the interview the contrast she is drawing is between herself 
> and the paths open to Janeane Garofalo and Sarah Silverman, two other women 
> who were also part of the alt comedy circles she ran with, and which Maron 
> was a dean of. Griffin seems a little jealous of the other two women, 
> perhaps implying that they had doors opened to them (both in films and 
> television) because of their looks (perhaps this is what led to her openly 
> admitted forays into plastic surgery), though I am quite sure Garofalo at 
> least would hotly dispute that. My own view would be that of those three 
> women, Griffin is by far the least talented, and so deserved to have fewer 
> doors opened for her. Griffin does acknowledge that she never was a 
> conventional comic or stand-up. But she does seem to have a chip on her 
> shoulder that she was told she was never on the list to replace Dave - 
> implying it was some kind of anti-woman thing. The fact that it even 
> occurred to her that she should replace Dave is evidence of a profoundly 
> different understanding of her career than I have, and it seems obvious her 
> being left off the long list had nothing to do with her gender.
>
> I dislike Kathy Griffin a lot less than I assumed I would before I was 
> very familiar with her work, and that is about as high as my regard goes 
> for her.
>

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to