> The NY Times has a background story (with, of course, no attribution > whatsoever, so you know NBC pushed this to them) with the timeline of how > it went down.
My favorite line from that story: "Mr. Burke acted decisively, according to one person, telling his colleagues to gather the facts so that they could make an expeditious but fair decision." What a wonderful guy. > But if the evidence remains as it is, and Williams does not > survive the controversy it will not be because he has been > proven to be a liar, but because NBC could not find the > courage and competence to manage the PR storm. Williams doesn't have to be proved a liar. He just has to lose the trust of the audience. Whether his misstatements are "innocent" false memories, or deliberate attempts at self-aggrandizement, if viewers no longer believe him, they'll turn to other newscasts. The stuff about how this pales compared to how TV news misreported the big stories is reminiscent of "The real scandal is what's legal." While that's often true in regard to congressional corruption, it doesn't mean illegal activities shouldn't be prosecuted. Similarly, getting away with reporting other peoples' incorrect statements as fact doesn't excuse reporters who make their own incorrect statements. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
