On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Joe Coughlin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Or, as you had alluded to, he was being paid too much for too little > ratings impact. I bet it's cost-cutting at Disney that's the cause of > this. I mean, this is a company that has had to cancel Fantastic Four > and throttle back on X-Men because they can't make movies from > them...all as a result of a big time shareholder pulling rank. But unless his ratings have been below expectations, or gone down (which I can not find any evidence for), how is the cost/benefit different now than it was 2 years years ago when they signed him? But I was not aware of the shareholder issue at Disney, which might make the difference. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
