I said one or two more lawsuits. In addition to what they have settled. These are multi-million dollar lawsuits. The sexual harassment suits that I am familiar with where the harassment was essentially proven settle for a half million. The fact Fox is paying more shows how much they want O'Reilly. But I agree One new claim and they are on the hook for major dough.
Not sent from an iPhone. On Apr 15, 2017, 7:30 PM, at 7:30 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: >At this point, for Fox News, it is already more than 1 or 2 lawsuits. >If >O'Reilly comes back and sexually harasses one more person, FN is well >and >truly screwed. I dont think anyone with a fiduciary responsibility to >look >after the corporate interests could justify taking that risk unless >they >are pretty damn sure he has not done anything recently. > > > > > >On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 6:28 PM Steve Timko <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> O'Reilly is their single biggest revenue producer. It's going to >take >> more than one or two more lawsuits for them to get rid of him. His >> popularity helps lift ratings of other shows >> >> Not sent from an iPhone. >> On Apr 15, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Steve Timko <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> With O'Reilly on vacation, Murdochs debate his future >>>> >>>> http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/14/media/oreilly-murdochs-debate/ >>>> >>>> I suspect his future has probably already been decided. If this >blows >>>> over, he comes back. If it continues to blow up, he's gone. I'm >guessing >>>> he's coming back and will be bloviating regularly. >>>> >>> >>> In order to make an educated guess you have to know if there are any >more >>> harassment suits in the pipeline and obviously nobody is going to >share >>> that information. If O'Reilly returns to the air and another lawsuit >>> appears it makes FNC look bad - well, worse. But they kept him >employed >>> knowing that he continued in his behavior. If they let him go and >another >>> lawsuit pops up FNC can say they wash their hands and it's >O'Reilly's >>> problem now. >>> >>> -- >> -- >> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "TV or Not TV" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups >> "TVorNotTV" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >-- >Sent from Gmail Mobile > >-- >-- >TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups "TV or Not TV" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected] >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en >--- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups "TVorNotTV" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >an email to [email protected]. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
