On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:18 AM, PGage <pga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If Matt Lauer told his bosses last night that he never engaged in any > inappropriate behavior, and was able to provide plausible support, and his > bosses were not able to identify any corroborating evidence to support the > allegations, then I don’t think he should have been fired today (nor do I > think he would have been). I think we know from the reporting today that, > ot the contrary, there was plenty of corroborating evidence for the > accusations, and that Lauer was unable to deny, or at least to do so > plausibly, the charges, and so he was fired - again, as he should have been. >
The New York Times and Variety were putting stories together about Lauer and getting victims to talk on the record. If NBC said they were going to depend on a Lauer denial in the face of those stories people higher would be held accountable. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
