I won the Wednesday and lost the Thursday, so I had the commissary 
experience. I don't know if it was just my group, but no one really wanted 
to talk to anyone else; not the night before, on the bus, in the greenroom, 
or in the audience (though there was a little bit of "Dammit, why couldn't 
I get this board?"). There was some small talk and chatter, but people were 
pretty nervous and tense (I know my own reaction was "Well, I'm finally 
here; I damn well better produce"). Even at lunch, people didn't say a lot 
(maybe one or two congratulated me, since I'd just won).

That night, I tried to get everyone together for a drink in the hotel bar, 
but no one responded. As I say, I don't know if it was just my group, or if 
that's a typical reaction, but while I didn't make any enemies (I don't 
think so, anyway), I sure didn't make any lifelong friends.

--Dave Sikula
On Saturday, January 30, 2021 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-8 [email protected] wrote:

> On my first episode, I finished the DJ! round with $9,400; Megan was in 
> the lead with $18,800.  My correct response in FJ! put us into a tie, and 
> if she hadn't wagered anything, we would have gone to a tiebreak.  I'm 
> forever grateful we didn't, 'cause she owned me on the button all day.
>
> Looking at my contestant agreement, it doesn't appear to specifically 
> exclude collusion between players, though there is an "I am aware that it 
> is a Federal offense punishable by fine and/or imprisonment for anyone to 
> rig the outcome of the Program with the intent to deceive the viewing 
> public" and an "I shall not share, or make any agreement or promise to 
> share, any prize or any portion of any prize with any other contestant". 
>  It feels like even a mildly-competent lawyer could get his client off 
> collusion charges if that was the crux of the show's case, but there's also 
> plenty of opportunity throughout to allow the show to withhold prize money 
> if you do something they feel is wrong.
>
> Contestants who have yet to tape sit together in the first few rows of the 
> audience section stage left.  I can't really speak to what it's like during 
> the shows; I was on the first episode we taped that day, so I never got the 
> experience of sitting in the audience and being nervous.  (Having lost on 
> the Wednesday show, I also never got the experience of lunch in the Sony 
> commissary.)  There's some down time in the green room while everyone takes 
> turns in the makeup chair and going over which stories go on the card for 
> Alex, but you're still within earshot of the contestant coordinators.  The 
> only real opportunity to set something up would be in the van on the way to 
> the studio--the 2-1/2 mile trip from the hotel to the studio in the rain 
> took, rather remarkably, about 20 minutes--but at that point, you don't 
> know anyone, and if you're gonna collude with someone, you're gonna need to 
> trust them.  (And trust that none of the the four or five other people in 
> the van who overheard your plotting will tattle to the contestant 
> coordinators.)
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2021, at 3:28 PM, 'David Bruggeman' via TVorNotTV <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> There's a possible angle to this issue that didn't come up in the 
> article.  Collusion.
>
> I know that the contestants are kept separated from the host, but how 
> about from each other?
>
> A recent episode of a podcast I listen to had a guest who'd been on Wheel 
> of Fortune.  She mentioned that a lot of the prep before taping was on ways 
> to cheat.  The contestant wranglers specifically mentioned making sure 
> people didn't agree to play a certain way and split the winnings later.
>
> Since, according to the article, the J! tiebreaker was prompted in part by 
> 2 ties on shows taped the same day, I wouldn't be surprised if someone 
> thought of the possibility.  I really wouldn't be surprised if it was a 
> lawyer who thought about it.
>
> David
>
> On Saturday, January 30, 2021, 7:40:54 AM PST, Diner <[email protected]> 
> wrote: 
>
>
> And here's why they added the tiebreaker:
>
> https://www.theringer.com/tv/2021/1/23/22245900/jeopardy-tiebreaker-scenario-rules-changes
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/645742991.426105.1612038484511%40mail.yahoo.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/645742991.426105.1612038484511%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/4115475f-1ced-4fd8-a42e-40a7f64ef2fen%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to