The only NC-17 rated film I remember seeing was Showgirls… and I wish I
could forget I ever saw it. I believe in that instance the rating was more
of a stunt than a viewer advisory. There was less nudity and less sex in
that than in other (better) movies with an R rating.

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 5:31 PM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote:

> The cinemas in New York and Los Angeles won’t show NC-17 films. The ones
> that will would also show them unrated. It’s possible they’re using the
> adult rating as a selling point.
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 8:15 PM Adam Bowie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have to concur with Tom that this makes little to no sense.
>>
>> I know that they have cinemas in New York and Los Angeles, so could it be
>> that they need MPAA certificates to get into even just those theatres? In
>> the UK, a few Netflix films get short cinema runs in some of the arthouse
>> chains (and I always wonder if Netflix gives incentives to those chains to
>> play the films). But even then, the titles that get these releases are the
>> awards hopefuls that Netflix usually saves up for later in the year. Those
>> films do need certification in the UK under the BBFC, which these days
>> tends to be more concerned with violence and sexual violence than more than
>> anything. I think only film clubs, not open to the paying public can show
>> unrated films.
>>
>> There was a good documentary a few years ago called This Film Is Not Yet
>> Rated which tore apart the US movie ratings scheme and noted the inequities
>> between hetero and homosexual deptictions resulting in different ratings.
>>
>> [Just before I hit send I saw Tom's reply...] Snap!
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:58 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A while back, filmmaker and occasional pot smoker Kevin Smith penned an
>>> essay about the MPAA that a quick Google search did not unearth, but I
>>> recall him explaining the process including the appeals for several of his
>>> films.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I find this story the way it’s reported to be confounding. Here’s what
>>>> I understand about movie ratings:
>>>>
>>>> Originally each state had a censorship board and each film had to be
>>>> submitted to each one and then cuts would have to be made in order for the
>>>> film to be distributed to theaters. As Hollywood grew to the point that
>>>> they couldn’t continue the system they set up a national production code
>>>> and an office in Hollywood to enforce it. The production code process lost
>>>> its teeth in the early sixties with lots of foreign films and independent
>>>> films coming into the market. The successor they came up with was the
>>>> ratings system. A filmmaker submits their script to the MPAA office, is
>>>> told the rating, and what they would have to change if they want a
>>>> different rating.
>>>>
>>>> Mature films got an X rating. With court decisions striking down
>>>> obscenity statutes, mainstream theaters started showing hardcore porn
>>>> movies with the X rating. Major theater chains decided not to show any X
>>>> rated movies, even serious adult themed ones. Same with newspapers and the
>>>> ads they’d accept. So the MPAA came up with NC-17 which was supposed to
>>>> differentiate from porn but it got caught up in the same embargo.
>>>>
>>>> In practical terms if a studio submits a script and is told it will get
>>>> an NC-17 rating they ask what changes they need to make to get an R rating
>>>> for distribution.
>>>>
>>>> Netflix doesn’t need to submit a film for a rating in order to stream
>>>> it and if wide theater distribution meant anything to them they’d make the
>>>> changes to get it to an R. And art houses will gladly accept unrated 
>>>> movies.
>>>>
>>>> What confounds me is why Netflix bothered to submit the script for a
>>>> rating in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 3:29 PM Mark Jeffries <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Blonde," the Netflix adaptation of Joyce Carol Oates' novelization of
>>>>> the life of Marilyn Monroe starring Ana de Armas as Marilyn, has picked up
>>>>> the scarlet "adults only" rating from the MPA, the first film made for a
>>>>> streamer with that rating:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/netflix-marilyn-monroe-blonde-nc17-1235118236/
>>>>>
>>>>> The possibility of a limited run in theaters may not be much of a
>>>>> problem in this case, since the major theater chains don't touch NC-17
>>>>> films with a fork lift and won't book Netflix films, while the mostly
>>>>> independent arthouse circuit will.  Besides, the big audience will be when
>>>>> it hits The Service.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/72fc934b-fc67-4429-9a52-eb3b72d42b10n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/72fc934b-fc67-4429-9a52-eb3b72d42b10n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiHDzDLYK%3DVtBLfGiyaNCvxxf_1z3PUu0Ea5-bwWZncuHg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiHDzDLYK%3DVtBLfGiyaNCvxxf_1z3PUu0Ea5-bwWZncuHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4DZnee3iWC-goRJ%3D1S35GRP-K7wLzhgVWGu_%2BcjTEvz5A%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4DZnee3iWC-goRJ%3D1S35GRP-K7wLzhgVWGu_%2BcjTEvz5A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAD_sJGDihkyxFkETtxii%2BdY1sGmfWHYnR1DeNgK4Kkr64t1s6w%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAD_sJGDihkyxFkETtxii%2BdY1sGmfWHYnR1DeNgK4Kkr64t1s6w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiE4FNeCyr6z3RkMdONMbJFmF68tN9EeDnHJbTWWqoNvaA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiE4FNeCyr6z3RkMdONMbJFmF68tN9EeDnHJbTWWqoNvaA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-- 
Kevin M. (RPCV)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4Ax2WEB2_oquYcfw7sno7JO6%2BoSJgDqaZT0eFKsZfK6tg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to