Yes!  The mount you have is for a fixed position configuration. 
I'm sure once you change the mount the motor will line up.

And I also had to change the angle of the dish, as you can see from the
pictures.  There was a lengthy discussion on another forum about the 
dish elevation meter of some dish mounts.  You may want to visit
http://www.sadoun.net   if you have not already.  Some good help there.

Jeff

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ldpaynejr 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:51 AM
  Subject: [TVRO] Re: Setup Question


  My latitude is 39.1 degrees N and my longitude is 77.6 degrees W. My
  declination is 10 degrees W.

  I checked with a post level and a bullseye level, and the mast is
  plumb. I have ordered a sturdier mast and I will remount it once it
  gets here.

  The motor elevation setting is at 39 degrees; it is midway between the
  38 and 40 degree marks. Based on the photo, I see that we are at
  about the same latitude.

  My dish mount elevation setting is 45 degrees; initially, I set it at
  40 degrees, but I found that 45 degrees gets the best signal. 

  My setup is similar to yours, but with one difference. The mount may
  be a problem, because I was sent the U bolt mount for the dish and not
  the pole mount. I suspect that this is the cause of the problem
  because it is not clear if the dish is exactly lined up on the motor arm.

  Since I am at 77 degrees W, I used AMC 5 at 79 degrees W. Since the
  Orasat 5.0 and the Satcontrol SM3D22 motor support USALS, I am using
  that. However, I would expect the motor to turn 2 degrees when the
  receiver is set to AMC, since 79 - 77 = 2, but the motor reads 10
  degrees when USALS points it.

  Thanks for your help. Once the larger mast and other bracket get
  here, I'll remount it. 



   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date: 4/22/2007 8:18 
PM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to