Not what I said in the least, but it's interesting that you should interpret it that way.
Re-read what I said. If someone is open sourcing something, in the true spirit of open source, they shouldn't care about getting credit in the source parameter. Thanks you and good night, I'm here all week, try the veal, don't forget to tip your waitresses and angry developers. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Cameron Kaiser<spec...@floodgap.com> wrote: > >> Yes, but don't distribute it. Obviously config files are human >> readable, but you blank out secrets before publishing them. >> >> People using open source libraries will have to get their own keys. >> So, either you really are contributing in the spirit of open source, >> and you don't care about getting credit, or you're doing it for self >> promotional purposes, and the conversation is moot anyhow. > > That's an asinine statement. So everybody who doesn't make their open > source software anonymous is a publicity whore? > > -- > ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ > -- > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com > -- In memory of John Banner > --------------------------------------------------- >
