Adam, Happy Id to you and all on this list. Secondly, With due respect to you, I want to point out that spammers dont typically read or care about responses.
However such responses leave a bad taste and spoil impression in minds of other mature and serious list subscribers. Tell me: what would your response implying death to spammer achieve.. Which a 'thread locked and sender blocked ' response would not achieve ? Best wishes man and my regards.. Nalin On 9/21/09, Adam Cloud <cloudy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sorry you find my responses disgusting. However, being one of the people > who always ends up having to fix things like this, i find it "disgusting and > offensive" when people invade legitimate platforms of communication and post > links to sites filled with malicious scripts and malware. > > 2009/9/20 Caliban Darklock <cdarkl...@gmail.com> > >> >> 2009/9/19 Nalin Savara <nsn...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > That's true about spam.. But the message 'you do suck at.. ' is >> > disgusting and offensive.. And apart from the spammer, even that >> > poster should be banned and blacklisted. >> >> If we banned and blacklisted everything disgusting and offensive, >> there would be no internet. >> > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com