Thanks for your mail Caliban. Cool.. I see your point..
Though I choose to differ and in my case I try to keep public mail exchanges mostly professional.. Anyways. . Take care buddy.. And have fun !!! Thanks and Regards, Nalin On 9/21/09, Caliban Darklock <cdarkl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2009/9/20 Nalin Savara <nsn...@gmail.com>: >> >> Tell me: what would your response implying death to spammer achieve.. >> Which a 'thread locked and sender blocked ' response would not achieve > > It's amusing. > > Granted, it's neither mature nor serious to snicker behind your hand > at a snide remark, but it's a lot more fun. When spammers try to make > money at our expense, it seems only fair that we could have a laugh or > two at theirs. > > And saying someone "should probably quit" life isn't necessarily an > implication that they should die, any more than "get a life" implies > that you're dead, or "real life" implies that other forms of life are > imaginary. You can take the mature and serious thing too far, and then > it's no fun anymore. > > Of course, you may not want to have fun, but there's certainly no > reason to run around shaking your finger at everyone who does. > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
