> > For the sake of argument, let's take this at face value as true. How > > about the search pollution issue with recurrent tweets in general? > > You may have a point. But it comes down to uneven enforcement. > Twitter smacks down an app because they allow an individual to recur, > say, every Monday: "Today is Monday and my office hours will be from > 2:15-3:30pm". > > Meanwhile, you have apps which do things like this: > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23fun140 > > Aren't those effectively recurring tweets?
I agree, and actually I have a filter rule for something very similar. But we're moving from definition of TOS to enforcement of same. -- ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * [email protected] -- You can't have everything. Where would you put it? -- Steven Wright --------
