Both will be allowed.

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for that Marcel, well if it's decided to completely abandon
> slugs I'll have to go down that route.
>
> Any idea on whether both call types will be allowed yet?  Obviously
> the main lookups will are quick to switch between, just this
> @screen_name/list_name that'll take more work if we can't use the
> slug.
>
> On Nov 2, 6:12 pm, Marcel Molina <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There is, in a sense, an API for resolving a list id by passing in a
>> slug. It's the show resource for a list. You'll either get a 404
>> (which means the slug no longer exist) or you'll get the list payload
>> which will include the id.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Using ID only for me is fine, except in the case we mention.  If there
>> > was a REST api to find a list ID based on a slug then it would mean we
>> > could still resolve @screen_name/list_name links otherwise we wouldn't
>> > be able to replicate it, except by brute force which would use yet
>> > more API calls.
>>
>> > On Nov 1, 6:14 pm, Marcel Molina <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Resolving a @screen_name/list_name reference in a tweet is a
>> >> compelling argument for making the url parameter polymorphic and not
>> >> deprecating the use of slugs. I will cogitate.
>>
>> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:09 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > I have to second Rich on this - ID-only is flawed, as twitter supports 
>> >> > hotlinking lists by name (@username/slug) in tweets, and links that to 
>> >> > the list page. If clients want to offer the same behavior, this is not 
>> >> > possible if the API only supports IDs (or would require a potentially 
>> >> > large number of additional requests to get the user's lists and page 
>> >> > through them to find the one mentioned).
>>
>> >> > Marco
>> >> > ------------------------
>>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Marcel Molina <[email protected]>
>> >> > Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:02:31
>> >> > To: <[email protected]>
>> >> > Subject: [twitter-dev] Re: Subscribed Lists
>>
>> >> > Currently it's still slug. It hasn't been updated yet. When it is
>> >> > updated it will for some period of transition accept a slug or an id
>> >> > but eventually support for the slug in the url will be removed
>> >> > entirely.
>>
>> >> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> Can we get some form of confirmation on the list slug/id issue.  At
>> >> >> the moment calling by ID doesn't work anyway so it's only using the
>> >> >> slug.
>>
>> >> >> My preference would be to allow either (in a similar way to the other
>> >> >> REST api's where you can use user id or screenName)
>>
>> >> >> On Oct 31, 10:04 pm, twittelator <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>> :user/lists/subscriptions.:format
>>
>> >> >>> gets the lists that the user has subscribed to.
>>
>> >> >>> Andrew Stone
>> >> >>> Twitter / @twittelatorhttp://www.stone.com
>> >> >>> got iPhone?
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/twitpro
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/intentionizer
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/gesture-buy
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/igraffiti
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/talkingpics
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/mobilemix
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/soundbite
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/icreated
>> >> >>>        http://tinyurl.com/pulsar-app
>>
>> >> >>> On Oct 30, 5:00 am, "David Neubauer" <[email protected]>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> > Has any figured out how to get a the lists I'm subscribed to. I 
>> >> >>> > didn't
>> >> >>> > realize how much I'd want this part of it. Please say it's coming...
>>
>> >> >>> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> >>> > From: [email protected]
>>
>> >> >>> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>> >> >>> > Jeremy Felt
>> >> >>> > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:16 PM
>> >> >>> > To: Twitter Development Talk
>> >> >>> > Subject: [twitter-dev] Re: Updates to the List API (list 
>> >> >>> > descriptions,
>> >> >>> > cursoring lists of lists, finding by list id rather than slug & more
>> >> >>> > consistent names)
>>
>> >> >>> > It appears that user/lists.xml only shows lists that are created by
>> >> >>> > the user and not those that they follow.
>>
>> >> >>> > Any change coming to that or am I missing a way to see all lists 
>> >> >>> > that
>> >> >>> > a user follows?
>>
>> >> >>> > Thanks,
>> >> >>> > Jeremy
>>
>> >> >>> > On Oct 28, 3:00 pm, Marcel Molina <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>> > > Two additions and two changes to the List API will be deployed in 
>> >> >>> > > the
>> >> >>> > > next few days:
>>
>> >> >>> > > * List descriptions
>> >> >>> > > We're adding a description to every list. You'll be able to 
>> >> >>> > > specify a
>> >> >>> > > description when you create or update a list and the description 
>> >> >>> > > will
>> >> >>> > > be included in the payload.
>>
>> >> >>> > > * Cursoring through lists of lists
>> >> >>> > > All resources that return a list of lists will include next and
>> >> >>> > > previous cursors and will accept a :cursor parameter.
>>
>> >> >>> > > * Finding by list id rather than slug
>> >> >>> > > When you change the name of a list, the slug will be updated to
>> >> >>> > > reflect that change. That means using the slug in the url for
>> >> >>> > > resources to operate on lists requires the onerous task of 
>> >> >>> > > validating
>> >> >>> > > that the slug for the list you are about to do something with 
>> >> >>> > > hasn't
>> >> >>> > > been updated since the last time you stored its slug. What a 
>> >> >>> > > nightmare
>> >> >>> > > :-)
>>
>> >> >>> > > Every list also has an id. This value won't change. We'll be 
>> >> >>> > > changing
>> >> >>> > > the API to replace all instances of a list slug in urls to be 
>> >> >>> > > list ids
>> >> >>> > > instead.
>>
>> >> >>> > > * Consistent names
>> >> >>> > > The terminology we've used thus far for people you follow with a 
>> >> >>> > > list
>> >> >>> > > is members. The terminology for people who are following a list is
>> >> >>> > > subscribers. We're going to mirror the terminology used for users 
>> >> >>> > > and
>> >> >>> > > change it to followers and following respectively.
>>
>> >> >>> > > So:
>>
>> >> >>> > > /:user/lists/:list_id/memberships becomes 
>> >> >>> > > /:user/lists/:list_id/followers
>>
>> >> >>> > > /:user/lists/:list_id/subscribers becomes 
>> >> >>> > > /:user/lists/:list_id/following
>>
>> >> >>> > > As we deploy these changes we'll send out a heads up on the dev 
>> >> >>> > > list
>> >> >>> > > and @twitterapi.
>>
>> >> >>> > > --
>> >> >>> > > Marcel Molina
>> >> >>> > > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/noradio
>>
>> >> > --
>> >> > Marcel Molina
>> >> > Twitter Platform Team
>> >> >http://twitter.com/noradio
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Marcel Molina
>> >> Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/noradio
>>
>> --
>> Marcel Molina
>> Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/noradio
>



-- 
Marcel Molina
Twitter Platform Team
http://twitter.com/noradio

Reply via email to