We've opened a ticket with the search team, I'll keep you up to date
as they make progress.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Martin Omander <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Searched the bug database again and found that someone had reported
> this a couple of weeks ago: 
> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=1154
>
> I added my experience with the bug to the existing bug report and
> starred it. If you care about since_id working in searches, feel free
> to
> add to the bug report!
>
> /Martin
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2:47 pm, Damon Clinkscales <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Martin Omander <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I noticed the same behavior in my app: when I include since_id in the
>> > search API call, I often don't get all the tweets I should. If I run
>> > without since_id, I see tweets with IDs that should have shown up in
>> > the search where I included since_id.
>>
>> > Any response from Twitter? The since_id parameter is a very useful
>> > feature of the API. It would reduce system load and bandwidth
>> > considerably for everyone if it worked right.
>>
>> Sounds like there is confirmation. Has anyone filed an issue?
>>
>> Once you have an issue link, please post back to this thread so people
>> can star it.
>>
>> Best,
>> -damon
>> --http://twitter.com/damon
>



-- 
   ---Mark

http://twitter.com/mccv

Reply via email to