The problem is this - we are doing promo stuff on Twitter, we were using http://tr.im but they never got back to us with an API key, and now we're using bit.ly. It's slick but if it's gonna be off by a factor of 10 for these low volume links we have a real reporting problem - we don't always get Google Analytics access to the sites in question.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Dmitri Snytkine <[email protected]>wrote: > I would stick with Google Analytics. I think they take out all the > requests by search bots and all duplicate requests and report actual > legit requests by users. > > Who knows how bit.ly does their click tracking, I sure don't > > On Feb 21, 9:36 pm, neal rauhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is anyone else seeing dramatic disparities between what bit.lyreports > > and what Google Analytics reports in terms of clicks? We're seeing like > 10:1 > > over reporting from bit.ly ... if Google Analytics is right. > > > > -- > > mailto:[email protected] // > > GoogleTalk: [email protected] > > GV: 202-642-1717 > -- mailto:[email protected] // GoogleTalk: [email protected] GV: 202-642-1717
