On 04/19/2010 11:21 PM, Raffi Krikorian wrote: > Not to be glib, but they are more than welcome to join in on the > conversation in the community. We plan to let the community really > drive this one.
Yes, but, for example, is Sir Tim Berners-Lee even *on* Twitter? I know Marshall Kirkpatrick is, but he's a journalist, not a standards-maker. Of course, there are *lots* of people I'd like to see on Twitter. http://borasky-research.net/2010/04/18/the-top-ten-people-who-should-be-on-twitter-but-arent/ > > > > On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:06 PM, R_Macdonald <roger.g.macdon...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> ReadWriteWebs's Co-Editor, Marshall Kirkpatrick, suggests today that >> Twitter intends to leave the annotation classification system to be >> determined by the market. >> http://bit.ly/csK8Od >> >> Although I appreciate that Twitter values keeping the annotation >> ecosystem open for innovation and adaptation, I hope the conversation >> on Linked Data metadata standards within Twitter annotations is just >> beginning. >> >> It could be an historic lost opportunity if the hard driving Twitter >> team doesn’t step back and consider soliciting the counsel of the W3C, >> Sir TB-L, Nigel Shadbolt and others in the Linked Data community. >> After all, Metaweb's Freebase team is just 3 blocks away. >> >> >> -- >> Subscription settings: >> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/subscribe?hl=en > > -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky borasky-research.net/m-edward-ed-borasky "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~ Paul Erdős
