I need to add: if you want to use the advantage of multiple CPUs/cores, single thread cannot do that.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stratus wrote: > > Thank you for your answer François. > > > > Ok. Another question rises : As I have to save to disk every stream > > received, should I process it on a different 'save to disk' thread, > > or the internal TSocket buffers can cope the wait? > > I'm pretty sure that you do not need multiple threads for this purpose. > Asynchron winsock API makes it possible. > > -- > Arno Garrels [TeamICS] > http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > >> Basically, this is the way to go. Don't worry too much about 50 > >> components because the code is shared by all components. Only the > >> data part is allocated for each. And you can use the same event > >> handlers for all of your 50 components, provided you correctly make > >> use of the "sender" argument in each event handler. Sender always > >> refer to the component triggering the event. > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be > -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
