> Signed-off-by: Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> cpu/arm926ejs/at91cap9/Makefile        |   46 ++++++++++
> cpu/arm926ejs/at91cap9/config.mk       |    2 +
> cpu/arm926ejs/at91cap9/ether.c         |   35 ++++++++
> cpu/arm926ejs/at91cap9/lowlevel_init.S |   43 +++++++++
> cpu/arm926ejs/at91cap9/spi.c           |  119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> cpu/arm926ejs/at91cap9/timer.c         |  149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> cpu/arm926ejs/at91cap9/usb.c           |   54 ++++++++++++
> cpu/arm926ejs/interrupts.c             |    2 +-
> cpu/arm926ejs/start.S                  |    3 +

How much is different from the Atmel AT91SAM926x U-Boot patches on 
www.linux4sam.org?
The CAP9 is very similar to the AT91SAM9263.
Should those chips share drivers?

Then it would be better to store the files in "cpu/arm926ejs/at91sam926x"

Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to