Le samedi 02 février 2008 à 06:59 +0100, Stefan Roese a écrit : > > I did think of that. I have no strong feeling about that. Except that if > > we put at91cap9adk under board/atmel, at91rm9200dk should go there too. > > Right. I always prefer to "collect" board ports from one manufacturer/brand > into a specific directory.
Manufacturer or brand/type ? Meaning, what do we do with the other AT91 based boards, which are not made by Atmel (cmc_pu2, csb637, kb9202, mp2usb) ? Stelian. -- Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
