>> > I did think of that. I have no strong feeling about that. Except that if >> > we put at91cap9adk under board/atmel, at91rm9200dk should go there too. >> >> Right. I always prefer to "collect" board ports from one manufacturer/brand >> into a specific directory. > > Manufacturer or brand/type ? Meaning, what do we do with the other AT91 > based boards, which are not made by Atmel (cmc_pu2, csb637, kb9202, > mp2usb) ? >
If they are not located in "board/atmel", it may make sense to create the "board/at91" and "board/avr32" directories for non-atmel boards. > Stelian. > -- > Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
