> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 22 april 2008 19:28
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> Cc: 'Stefan Roese'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used 
> _start instead of
> CFG_MONITOR_BASE
> 
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:49:57 +0200
> "Joakim Tjernlund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > Currently WD's top of tree renders 83xx kaput.  When I revert this
> > > revert plus Joakim's original 70431e8 commit, things are back to
> > > normal.  I'm not going to pretend I know to fix it up correctly, so
> > > does anyone have a problem with me sending two revert patches until
> > > relocation is properly and comprehensively fixed?
> >
> > Strange, I got a 8321 and it worked for me. Maybe a toolchain issue? Perhaps
> > I got something extra in my board port, dunno what though.
> >
> I just reconfirmed it using WD's TOT w/gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red
> Hat 4.1.2-27).

Got gcc 3.4.6 here, so I guess there is some difference between them(or perhaps
ld). Can't help you, so do as you wish.

   Jocke


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to