On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:26 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Even though it's MIPS that needs it, it should be flagged as a NAND > patch since that's the code it touches.
Totally agree. > How about this? > > if (state == FL_ERASING) > timeo = CFG_HZ * 2 / 5; > else > timeo = CFG_HZ / 50 > > If we have CFG_HZ values that are within a factor of 2 of wrapping > around, the platform should probably do some downward scaling (or we > should think about 64-bit timestamps)... Much better than my original patch. Should I revert, retry, and resend? -- Jason McMullan MTS SW System Firmware NetApp 724.741.5011 Fax 724.741.5166 Direct 412.656.3519 Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netapp.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
