Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> if (state == FL_ERASING)
>>      timeo = CFG_HZ * 2 / 5;
>> else
>>      timeo = CFG_HZ / 50
>>
>> If we have CFG_HZ values that are within a factor of 2 of wrapping 
>> around, the platform should probably do some downward scaling (or we 
>> should think about 64-bit timestamps)...
> 
> Not needed. CFG_HZ == 1000 for all sane ports.
> 
> Broken ports should be fixed.

Maybe we should define it in a non-board-specific header, so as to make 
the intent clear that it not actually be configurable?

-Scott

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to