Dear Ricardo, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Sorry to hear that. I have tried to give all my best and follow the > style of the ml300 board, which was the closest board to mine. > On FPGAs board I think that it is not a horrible idea to follow this > style. Maybe you should consider to create an FPGA branch, where the > generic drivers could be accepted. As I said, the FPGA hardware
Believe me, this makes no sense. Copying the same files around quickly results in an unmaintainable mess. Adding lots of code which are not actually needed just prevent anybody from actually understanding which code is essential and which not. We've been there before, and we learned this lesson. > changes a lot and support a so changing hardware will be very > difficult... Or just should not support FPGAs and its IP devices... I do not think that FPGA have any inherent problems. The issue is with the base code which was not written with a boot loader (or portability and efficiency) in mind. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A weak mind is like a microscope, which magnifies trifling things, but cannot receive great ones. -- Philip Earl of Chesterfield ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
