Is there any concern with moving .bss outside of the image? On 85xx
the images have historically been a fixed size (512k) and the .bss has
always lived inside of that region. We are now getting to a point
that .text + .data + .bss exceeds 512k. Its easy enough to move .bss
right pass the 512k boundary and wanted to see if anyone can think of
a reason not to do this.
Also, any cute ways of doing this in the linker script?
Right now if the TEXT_BASE is 0xeff80000 I'm doing:
. = ADDR(.text) + 0x80000;
__bss_start = .;
.bss (NOLOAD) :
{
*(.sbss) *(.scommon)
*(.dynbss)
*(.bss)
*(COMMON)
}
- k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
