On Jul 29, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <2A2FDF2A-7B9D-496C-960C- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Is there any concern with moving .bss outside of the image? On 85xx >> the images have historically been a fixed size (512k) and the .bss >> has >> always lived inside of that region. We are now getting to a point >> that .text + .data + .bss exceeds 512k. Its easy enough to move .bss >> right pass the 512k boundary and wanted to see if anyone can think of >> a reason not to do this. > > You have to make sure that the memory map is still OK in the > relocated system, taking into account for config options like pRAM, > shared log buffer, frame buffer, ...
Ok. I think that all works out ok because _end is after .bss. - k ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
