In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Is there any concern with moving .bss outside of the image? On 85xx
> the images have historically been a fixed size (512k) and the .bss has
> always lived inside of that region. We are now getting to a point
> that .text + .data + .bss exceeds 512k. Its easy enough to move .bss
> right pass the 512k boundary and wanted to see if anyone can think of
> a reason not to do this.
You have to make sure that the memory map is still OK in the
relocated system, taking into account for config options like pRAM,
shared log buffer, frame buffer, ...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The project was large enough and management communication poor enough
to prompt many members of the team to see themselves as contestants
making brownie points, rather than as builders making programming
products. Each suboptimized his piece to meet his targets; few
stopped to think about the total effect on the customer.
- Fred Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
