On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > >> PATCH: >> diff --git a/tools/mxsboot.c b/tools/mxsboot.c >> index 6c05aa4..d92c39f 100644 >> --- a/tools/mxsboot.c >> +++ b/tools/mxsboot.c >> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static int mx28_create_sd_image(int infd, int outfd) >> >> fsize = lseek(infd, 0, SEEK_END); >> lseek(infd, 0, SEEK_SET); >> - size = fsize + 512; >> + size = fsize + 4 * 512; >> >> buf = malloc(size); >> if (!buf) { >> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static int mx28_create_sd_image(int infd, int outfd) >> goto err0; >> } >> >> - ret = read(infd, (uint8_t *)buf + 512, fsize); >> + ret = read(infd, (uint8_t *)buf + 4 * 512, fsize); >> if (ret != fsize) { >> ret = -1; >> goto err1; >> @@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ static int mx28_create_sd_image(int infd, int outfd) >> cb->drv_info[0].chip_num = 0x0; >> cb->drv_info[0].drive_type = 0x0; >> cb->drv_info[0].tag = 0x1; >> - cb->drv_info[0].first_sector_number = sd_sector + 1; >> - cb->drv_info[0].sector_count = (size - 1) / 512; >> + cb->drv_info[0].first_sector_number = sd_sector + 4; >> + cb->drv_info[0].sector_count = (size - 4) / 512; >> >> wr_size = write(outfd, buf, size); >> if (wr_size != size) { > > My mx28evk does not boot with this patch applied.
As it does not work in mx28evk I'd prefer to use my previously proposed patch as it keeps clear what is done for mx23 and mx28. What people think? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
