On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 11:37:20 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 05:12:40 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > >> On 09/01/2015 03:33 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 09:38:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> >> On Tue 2015-09-01 00:23:49, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> >>> On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 09:57:05 PM, > >> >>> [email protected] > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> >>>> From: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Add support for the Terasic DE0-Nano/Atlas-SoC Kit, which is a > >> >>>> CycloneV based board. The board can boot from SD/MMC. Ethernet is a > >> >>>> bit different because it has a KSZ9031 PHY, so for now, ethernet > >> >>>> doesn't quite work yet, as a few patches are needed to support the > >> >>>> PHY. > >> >>> > >> >>> I thought we did support the KSZ9031 PHY. What's the problem ? > >> >>> > >> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]> > >> >>>> --- > >> >>>> Hi Marek, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> This patch is based on your u-boot-socfpga/wip/boards branch. > >> >>> > >> >>> OK, that makes sense. > >> >>> > >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >>>> Dinh > >> >>>> --- > >> >>>> > >> >>>> arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 + > >> >>>> arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 61 +++ > >> >>>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig | 7 + > >> >>>> board/terasic/de0/MAINTAINERS | 5 + > >> >>>> board/terasic/de0/Makefile | 9 + > >> >>> > >> >>> I think it might be clearer to rename it to de0-nano-soc, what do > >> >>> you think ? What's the difference between de0-nano-soc and atlas > >> >>> btw ? > >> >> > >> >> Unless they are going to make "de0-mega".. I'd say "de0" is clean > >> >> enough. > >> > > >> > They already make de0-cv , which is cycloneV SoC based, so de0 is not > >> > clear enough, no way. They also make de0-nano , which is cycloneIV > >> > based (without soc). > >> > >> After looking around the site a bit more, I think "de0_nano_sockit" is > >> more appropriate? > > > > It's de0-nano-soc, that's what they call it on that website, right ? > > SoCkit is a separate board. > > Ah yes, it's de0-nano-soc<space>kit. So "de0-nano-soc" ?
Yeah, exactly :) Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
