On 2/19/20 11:12 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:05 PM Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Instead of always using the "clock-frequency" property to determine cpu >> frequency, try using a clock in "clocks" if it exists. This patch also >> fixes a bug where there could be spurious higher frequencies if sizeof(u32) >> != sizeof(ulong). >> > > I just realized the commit title looked a little bit confusing. > > I think it could be more specific like: > > riscv: Try to get cpu frequency from a "clocks" node if it exists > > ? > > Regards, > Bin >
That makes sense to me. --Sean