On 10/20/20 12:20 PM, Y.b. Lu wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 5:52 AM
>> To: Y.b. Lu <yangbo...@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Peng Fan
>> <peng....@nxp.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: fsl_esdhc: make sure delay chain locked for
>> HS400
>>
>> Dear Yangbo,
>>
>> On 10/16/20 12:13 PM, Yangbo Lu wrote:
>>> For eMMC HS400 mode, the DLL reset is a required step for mmc rescan.
>>> This step has not been documented in reference manual, but the RM will
>>> be fixed sooner or later.
>>>
>>> This patch is to add the step of DLL reset, and make sure delay chain
>>> locked for HS400.
>>>
>>> Fixes: db8f93672b42 ("mmc: fsl_esdhc: support eMMC HS400 mode")
>>> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo...@nxp.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com>
>>
>> Just added minor comments.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>  include/fsl_esdhc.h     |  4 ++++
>>>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
>>> index 68130ee..a18316e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
>>> @@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ struct fsl_esdhc {
>>>     uint    sdtimingctl;    /* SD timing control register */
>>>     char    reserved8[20];  /* reserved */
>>>     uint    dllcfg0;        /* DLL config 0 register */
>>> -   char    reserved9[680]; /* reserved */
>>> +   char    reserved9[12];  /* reserved */
>>> +   uint    dllstat0;       /* DLL status 0 register */
>>> +   char    reserved10[664];/* reserved */
>>>     uint    esdhcctl;       /* eSDHC control register */
>>>  };
>>>
>>> @@ -617,9 +619,11 @@ static void esdhc_exit_hs400(struct fsl_esdhc_priv
>> *priv)
>>>     esdhc_tuning_block_enable(priv, false);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -static void esdhc_set_timing(struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv, enum bus_mode
>> mode)
>>> +static int esdhc_set_timing(struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv, enum bus_mode
>> mode)
>>>  {
>>>     struct fsl_esdhc *regs = priv->esdhc_regs;
>>> +   ulong start;
>>> +   u32 val;
>>>
>>>     /* Exit HS400 mode before setting any other mode */
>>>     if (esdhc_read32(&regs->tbctl) & HS400_MODE &&
>>> @@ -640,17 +644,33 @@ static void esdhc_set_timing(struct fsl_esdhc_priv
>> *priv, enum bus_mode mode)
>>>                     esdhc_setbits32(&regs->dllcfg0, DLL_FREQ_SEL);
>>>
>>>             esdhc_setbits32(&regs->dllcfg0, DLL_ENABLE);
>>> +
>>> +           esdhc_setbits32(&regs->dllcfg0, DLL_RESET);
>>> +           udelay(1);
>>
>> Could you add a light comment why need to put udelay(1)?
> 
> Actually this is just per fixed reference manual.
> I sent out v2 patch, to explain in commit message in case some one what to 
> know why.
> 
> "    In previous commit to support eMMC HS400,
>       db8f936 mmc: fsl_esdhc: support eMMC HS400 mode
> 
>     the steps to configure DLL could be found in commit message,
>       13. Set DLLCFG0[DLL_ENABLE] and DLLCFG0[DLL_FREQ_SEL].
>       14. Wait for delay chain to lock.
> 
>     these would be fixed as,
>       13.   Set DLLCFG0[DLL_ENABLE] and DLLCFG0[DLL_FREQ_SEL].
>       13.1  Write DLLCFG0[DLL_RESET] to 1 and wait for 1us,
>             then write DLLCFG0[DLL_RESET]
>       14.   Wait for delay chain to lock."
> 
> Thanks.

Thanks you for kindly explanation.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Jaehoon Chung
>>
>>> +           esdhc_clrbits32(&regs->dllcfg0, DLL_RESET);
>>> +
>>> +           start = get_timer(0);
>>> +           val = DLL_STS_SLV_LOCK;
>>> +           while (!(esdhc_read32(&regs->dllstat0) & val)) {
>>> +                   if (get_timer(start) > 1000) {
>>> +                           printf("fsl_esdhc: delay chain lock timeout\n");
>>> +                           return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>> +                   }
>>> +           }
>>> +
>>>             esdhc_setbits32(&regs->tbctl, HS400_WNDW_ADJUST);
>>>
>>>             esdhc_clock_control(priv, false);
>>>             esdhc_flush_async_fifo(priv);
>>>     }
>>>     esdhc_clock_control(priv, true);
>>> +   return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static int esdhc_set_ios_common(struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv, struct mmc
>> *mmc)
>>>  {
>>>     struct fsl_esdhc *regs = priv->esdhc_regs;
>>> +   int ret;
>>>
>>>     if (priv->is_sdhc_per_clk) {
>>>             /* Select to use peripheral clock */
>>> @@ -667,7 +687,9 @@ static int esdhc_set_ios_common(struct
>> fsl_esdhc_priv *priv, struct mmc *mmc)
>>>             set_sysctl(priv, mmc, mmc->clock);
>>>
>>>     /* Set timing */
>>> -   esdhc_set_timing(priv, mmc->selected_mode);
>>> +   ret = esdhc_set_timing(priv, mmc->selected_mode);
>>> +   if (ret)
>>> +           return ret;
>>>
>>>     /* Set the bus width */
>>>     esdhc_clrbits32(&regs->proctl, PROCTL_DTW_4 | PROCTL_DTW_8);
>>> diff --git a/include/fsl_esdhc.h b/include/fsl_esdhc.h
>>> index e6f1c75..850a304 100644
>>> --- a/include/fsl_esdhc.h
>>> +++ b/include/fsl_esdhc.h
>>> @@ -187,8 +187,12 @@
>>>
>>>  /* DLL config 0 register */
>>>  #define DLL_ENABLE         0x80000000
>>> +#define DLL_RESET          0x40000000
>>>  #define DLL_FREQ_SEL               0x08000000
>>>
>>> +/* DLL status 0 register */
>>> +#define DLL_STS_SLV_LOCK   0x08000000
>>> +
>>>  #define MAX_TUNING_LOOP            40
>>>
>>>  #define HOSTVER_VENDOR(x)  (((x) >> 8) & 0xff)
>>>
> 

Reply via email to