Dear Heiko Schocher, > ... but I don;t know if this is the right change! Better would > be to know, why the last entry in __rel_dyn_start is filled with > 00000000 ...
As an EOF marker, maybe? Maybe the loop should be left by ble and a test for zero of an entry? Umm "ble" seems wrong to me anyway: start = first entry, end = address AFTER last entry, so it should be "blt", or? Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
