Le 31/10/2010 23:28, Alexander Holler a écrit : > On 31.10.2010 22:20, Albert Aribaud wrote: > >> Alexander, Darius, others who already tested the previous RFC patch, >> please test for non-regression. > > Still works here with that patch applied. But that isn't remarkable, because > >> #ifdef CONFIG_NAND_SPL > > that isn't defined here. ;)
... and tx25 seems not to have it defined either, so my change should not have affected Wolfgang's tests. :/ Wolfgang, could you: - make available to me the exact source tree you're compiling, including my patches as you applied them plus your changes to them, either as a clonable git repo or as a patch set to apply on the current u-boot master branch; - indicate exactly how you build your u-boot; - provide the u-boot binary that you last built (the one that has no output). My goal here is to reproduce an u-boot identical to yours, in order to make sur I can produce controlled u-boots for tx25, and then build some specific tx25 u-boots for you to run. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
