Hi Jason,

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:04:27AM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote:
> If CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is enabled on kirkwood SoCs, this will print the
> speeds of the various components.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>       - optimized macros to remove one-timers
>       - reduced switch/case to if/else since it operates on one bit.
>       - remove RFC
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c    |   41 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c 
> b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c
> index b4a4c04..818c82f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c
> @@ -270,11 +270,28 @@ static void kw_sysrst_check(void)
>  }
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
> +#define MSAR_CPUCLCK_EXTRACT(X)      (((X & 0x2) >> 1) | ((X & 0x400000) >> 
> 21) | \
> +                             ((X & 0x18) >> 1))
> +#define MSAR_L2CLCK_EXTRACT(X)  (((X & 0x600) >> 9) | ((X & 0x80000) >> 17))
> +#define MSAR_DDRCLCK_RTIO_MASK  (0xf << 5)
> +
> +/*
> + * TCCLK bit:
> + *   1 = 166 MHz
> + *   0 = 200 MHz
> + */
> +#define MSAR_TCLCK_MASK              0x00200000
> +#define MV_BOARD_TCLK_166MHZ 166666667
> +#define MV_BOARD_TCLK_200MHZ 200000000
> +
>  int print_cpuinfo(void)
>  {
>       char *rev;
>       u16 devid = (readl(KW_REG_PCIE_DEVID) >> 16) & 0xffff;
>       u8 revid = readl(KW_REG_PCIE_REVID) & 0xff;
> +     u32 cpu_clk, t_clk, tmp;
> +     u32 sys_clk, l2_clk;
> +     u32 l2_ratio, ddr_ratio;
>  
>       if ((readl(KW_REG_DEVICE_ID) & 0x03) > 2) {
>               printf("Error.. %s:Unsupported Kirkwood SoC 88F%04x\n", 
> __FUNCTION__, devid);
> @@ -297,6 +314,30 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void)
>       }
>  
>       printf("SoC:   Kirkwood 88F%04x_%s\n", devid, rev);
> +
> +     tmp = readl(MPP_SAMPLE_AT_RESET);
> +     cpu_clk = MSAR_CPUCLCK_EXTRACT(tmp);
> +     if (cpu_clk == 0x9)
> +             cpu_clk = 1200;
> +

I suspect this code to be broken. Here you get a clock selector (which
is only relevant for 6281 and 6191 SoCs) from the reset at sample
register.

Which clock frequency do you pick if the selector is not 0x9 ?

You should probably use a convertion array from selector to CPU
frequency. Here is a such array valid for 6281 and 6191 SoCs:

u32 kw_6281_cpu_clk[] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 600000000, 0, 800000000, 1000000000,
                          0, 1200000000, 0, 0, 1500000000, 0, 0, 0 };


Note that I don't know if this array is valid for 6282 and 6283 SoCs.

But for sure, the clock selector for a 6180 SoC is given by differents
bits in the reset at sample register: [4:2] against [4:3],[22],[1].
The conversion array is different too...

Regards,

Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to