On 15.09.2026 14:20, Reza Kurniawan via groups.io wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 4:45 PM Alexey Minnekhanov <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
It's doing the same as the patch that was already posted, right? [1]
Sadly it got no reviews, which kind of demotivates any further
contributions to u-boot/qcom.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/
Hi,
I didn't know about the submission when I was making this, apologies.
Yes, you're right, it is doing the same thing as your patch.
I also wish it could be applied first, then I could put mine on top of it.
It seems like a more elegant solution compared to my own.
--
Regards,
Reza Kurniawan
No problems! Your solution is also a solution, abeit very specific one;
I think the difference is having bit-flags is a bit more flexible than a
boolean true/false flag, and a bit closer to linux clk-qcom drivers.
I'd be glad if situation with broken GDSC hadling for older SoCs is
resolved in one way or another, that would already be a progress.
--
Regards,
Alexey Minnekhanov
