On 9/21/26 3:30 PM, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 01:45:05PM +0800, Tom Hsieh wrote:
From: Tom Hsieh <[email protected]>
The driver defines PHY_CTRL3_TXVREF_TUNE_MASK,
PHY_CTRL3_TXRISE_TUNE_MASK, PHY_CTRL3_TXPREEMP_TUNE_MASK,
PHY_CTRL3_COMPDISTUNE_MASK, PHY_CTRL3_TX_VBOOST_LEVEL_MASK,
PHY_CTRL4_PCS_TX_DEEMPH_3P5DB_MASK and
[...]
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
What is the policy on this in U-Boot? If we re-use the Linux kernel one
it should be just LLM.
The author of the patch has to understand the code, and more
importantly, be legally responsible for the code they added. Therefore
the author cannot be purely the AI.
For example if the AI generated the code based on some problematic or
closed-source content (do we surely know it did not?), the author has to
be legally responsible for any damages.
