On 21.09.26 15:54, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 9/21/26 3:30 PM, Francesco Dolcini wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 01:45:05PM +0800, Tom Hsieh wrote: >>> From: Tom Hsieh <[email protected]> >>> >>> The driver defines PHY_CTRL3_TXVREF_TUNE_MASK, >>> PHY_CTRL3_TXRISE_TUNE_MASK, PHY_CTRL3_TXPREEMP_TUNE_MASK, >>> PHY_CTRL3_COMPDISTUNE_MASK, PHY_CTRL3_TX_VBOOST_LEVEL_MASK, >>> PHY_CTRL4_PCS_TX_DEEMPH_3P5DB_MASK and >> >> [...] >> >>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5 >> >> What is the policy on this in U-Boot? If we re-use the Linux kernel one >> it should be just LLM. > The author of the patch has to understand the code, and more > importantly, be legally responsible for the code they added. Therefore > the author cannot be purely the AI. > > For example if the AI generated the code based on some problematic or > closed-source content (do we surely know it did not?), the author has to > be legally responsible for any damages.
I think what Francesco wanted to point out is that the current kernel scheme for the Assisted-by tag is now just "Assisted-by: LLM" where it previously was "Assisted-by: <LLM provider>-<LLM-name>-<LLM-version>". He didn't suggest to have only an Assisted-by tag and no human Signed-off-by.
