Adrian...could you give me specifics about why you dropped the dynamic files in favor of hashed? And how large were your files?
Thanks, Debbie Reeves >From: Adrian Matthews <Adrian.Matthews <at> igindex.co.uk> >Subject: RE: [U2] UV - file load discrepancy on type 30 >file >Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:44:39 +0100 > >MFILES of 112 seems very low to me. Must be quite a small >system. > >We used to get the file load message a lot before we >dropped dynamic files(too poor >under extreme load) and >went back to hashed files. At the time our MFILES was 1000. ________________________________ >>From: owner-u2-users <at> listserver.u2ug.org on behalf >>of dreeves2 <at> alltel.net >>Sent: Mon 16/08/2004 16:13 >>To: u2-users <at> listserver.u2ug.org >>Subject: [U2] UV - file load discrepancy on type 30 file >> >>When running uvfixfile on a dynamic file (currently has >>about 340,000 records)we >>are getting a file load >>discrepancy warning. Uvfixfile will repair it, but it >>>>recurs from time to time. Our software vendor >>recommended increasing MFILES in >>uvconfig. We have >>increased it twice, from 24, to 56 and then to 112 with >>the >>same results. Anybody have any ideas? Should we >>take it higher, or is there some >>other solution? >> >>Universe release 9.5.2.1.r8 >>AIX release 4.3.3.0 >> >>Thanks, >>Debbie Reeves ------- ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
