We're beating a dead horse. I offered this method around 200 posts or 10 days ago. Mark Johnson ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 12:17 PM Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question
> I can NAME THAT TUNE in *** 2 *** notes: > > LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO > blah blah blah > REPEAT > > ;) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Phillips > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 10:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Select Question > > > > > >> READNEXT ID FROM LIST ELSE ID = @AM > > > > >But why do you use an odd convention like ID = @AM ? > > > > > > because it would be impossible for ID to be an attribute mark via > > > readnext. > > > If you later test for ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) there's only one way that could > > > have > > > happened. > > Of course, in most programs it might be clearer to write > > LOOP > READNEXT ID FROM LIST ELSE EXIT > blah blah blah > REPEAT > > rather than testing a amgic valid of ID. > > > Martin Phillips > Ladybridge Systems > 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB > +44-(0)1604-709200 > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
