Symeon: This is useful when outside developers are working on a test U2 dbms within our network. This way, we don't have to install UO/UO.NET (a 450Mb download) or mess with our firewalls. Quite useful, really. :-)
Bill >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen >Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:11 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO > >mv.NET can also connect back to the host via telnet - which always makes me >grin, but I am sure it has its uses. > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno >Sent: 18 July 2007 08:46 >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO > >Just to clarify - mv.NET can use standard UO but has also been enabled to >use UO.NET for a long time now, and standard UO might not even be supported >in a near-future release. It's preferable to use managed components all >the way through, so UO.NET is the preferred pipe. >T > >LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: >> >> mv.NET from BlueFinity would be using standard UniObjects and as >> such, could not take advantage of connection pooling from U2 (CP). ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
