LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: > Tony, > How long is "a long time now"? I have quite a bit of history with the > product and if BF enabled it for UO.NET, it would only be from v3 > (and I haven't time to confirm if it is v3), which is a fairly new > version.
Long time = over a year now. Current release is v3.5.0.5. I keep my clients informed about the latest releases - your vendor should do you the same favor. ;) > Having said that, mv.NET doesn't dictate whether connection > pooling has been properly licensed (which in enables it as well) on > the U2 server. Correct, never said anything different. Since mv.NET uses its own pooling, the presence or absence of CP is irrelevant. > Also, I provided a link in my previous post to an IBM > white paper that should demonstrate coding with CP in mind. After I hit the send button on my last note I kicked myself for not expressing gratitude for that link to ibmu2.microsoftnet.pdf. I have an old v1 copy of that and I want to thank you very much for the v2 link. Yes, I see the code in there: UniObjects.UOPooling = true; UniObjects.MinPoolSize = 1; UniObjects.MaxPoolSize = 10; It looks very easy and one of these days I'm sure I'll make use of it. Regards, T ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
