Thanks everyone, it is reassuring to know it is only the HASH.HELP prog and not our data that has corruption.
I see that HASH.HELP had been fixed in 10.2.4 - maybe it is time to upgrade? Schalk > We are running 10.1.21 on Linux so not exactly the same as you but we > have reported a bug in HASH.HELP for this exact failure. IBM has put it > on an ecase to be fixed. Until it is you might consider using > HASH.HELP.DETAIL which does not have this problem. HASH.HELP.DETAIL has > two pages of output, the second of which is identical to that of > HASH.HELP. > > Hope this helps. > > Perry Taylor > Zirmed, Inc. ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
