Since we're talking OOB (out of box) why not try the user semaphore
locking that is built into the system. Check the BASIC LOCK and UNLOCK
, and LIST.LOCKS in tcl. Your process cant write until it can lock. It
writes, then unlocks. and so on.
j

On 4/25/08, Marco Manyevere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   Thank you all for all the responses.
>
>   I was hoping that somewhere within the operating system's scheduling
>   mechanism there is something like a timeslice serial number which could be
>   read with some system function. No 2 processes could ever return the same
>   timeslice serial number within a day for example. My unique id would then be
>   formed as follows:
>
>   <snip>
>
>   BASEKEY = DATE():"*":time slice serial number
>   IF BASEKEY EQ PREVBASEKEY THEN
>      SEQ.NUM += 1
>   ELSE
>      PREVBASEKEY = BASEKEY
>      SEQ.NUM = 1
>   END
>
>   UNIQUE.KEY = BASEKEY:"*":SEQ.NUM
>
>   </snip>
>
>   This way there would be no need for extra IOs and no bottlenecks on a
>   syncronisation key.
>
>   --- On Fri, 25/4/08, Glen B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>     From: Glen B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     Subject: RE: [U2] Guaranteed unique sequential keys
>     To: [email protected]
>     Date: Friday, 25 April, 2008, 5:30 AM
> You'll need a central key generator to manage high
> resolution sortable
> sequential keys. You can use whatever connection medium is feasible and let
> a single process/phantom generate the keys in numerical order. The problem
> with using a key generator like this is that you could easily produce a
> bottleneck. On the other hand, the benefit of doing it this way is that the
> generator can be a single phantom. It can keep track of the last used key in
> memory and can pregenerate keys for near-future or parallel usage. If the
> connection medium you choose allows for multiple requests at a time, then
> your management code must be able to manage and pregenerate keys for each
> "thread" concurrently. A wide solution could be a socket service that
> serves
> unique keys to clients. I use base-16 for a lot of sequential keys so that I
> have many unique iterations per key length. I always use them as direct
> pointers and I never sort them, though. Hex sortability from
> LIST/SORT/SELECT could be questionable.
>
> Glen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:55 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [U2] Guaranteed unique sequential keys
> >
> >
> > What is the most reliable way to generate unique sequential keys without
> > having to resort to a record on disk updated through readu/write? The
> keys
> > don't have to be contiguous but only be sortable in the order in
> > which they
> > were generated by several phantom processes running concurrently. I'm
> > currently approximating this using a concatenation of date and time with
> > millisecondsB but I'm worried about the possibility of two
> > phantoms generating
> > exactly the same key.
> > B
> > Although no collision has been detected so far, I
> > have added an extra check where after generating the key I first test if
> a
> > record with that key exists. If so IB increment and append aB
> > serial number
> > and repeat the test until aB unique key is found. ItB seems to be
> > working well
> > but I still think there is a better way to do this.
> > B
> > Thanks for any help.
> > B
> > Marco.
> >
> >
> >       __________________________________________________________
> > Sent
> > from Yahoo! Mail.
> > A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
> > -------
> > u2-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe please visit
>   http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>     _________________________________________________________________
>
>   Yahoo! For Good. Give and get cool things for free, reduce waste and help
>   our planet. Plus find hidden Yahoo! treasure
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>


-- 
john
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to