Hi The biggest thing will be to choose what flavour to run your universe accounts in, this will affect how similar any TCL and dictionary items will be.
As far as the unibasic extensions these are coded to be the same on both udt and uv. Rgds Symeon -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eugene St. Clair Sent: 15 August 2008 02:42 To: [email protected] Subject: [U2] Unidata to Universe port Hello: Does any one have any experiences they would be willing to share regarding the effort required to port applications from UniData to Universe? We're currently on Unidata 7.1 We developed our application in an early version of SB+ and UniBasic and have kept current on SB+, so we're now at version 5.4. We've also made use of various connectivity technolgies over time, such as ODBC, OLEDB, and UniObjects. We haven't used the web services or ADO provider yet, but probably will eventually. We are currently running on Windows but a Unix flavor is not out of the question if there is a compelling reason. At this point, I'm just trying to figure out a way to gauge the relative effort, and if there were any surprises, such as better/worse performance, costs, development effort, etc and of course, any gotchas. Also, is it feasible to to code the application in a way that it would work on either platform from the same code base? The reason we're even considering this is because of IBM's decision not to implement NLS in UniData, at least not right away. Of course, we've had conversations with IBM about converting, but would appreciate hearing from any one who has actually done this. thanks in advance. Eugene ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1612 - Release Date: 14/08/2008 18:03 ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
